ASPEN/SCCM vs ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition

Enteral nutrition (EN) plays a vital role in the management of critically ill patients, ensuring adequate energy and nutrient intake. However, guidelines differ on when and how to implement EN effectively. Two of the most widely referenced guidelines in clinical nutrition are those from ASPEN/SCCM (American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition/Society of Critical Care Medicine) and ESPEN (European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism). This article provides a detailed comparison of their recommendations on key aspects of enteral nutrition in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

1. When Should Enteral Nutrition Be Started?

Both ASPEN/SCCM and ESPEN emphasize the importance of early enteral nutrition within 24–48 hours of ICU admission. ASPEN/SCCM recommends initiating EN within this time frame, while ESPEN strongly advises starting EN within 48 hours instead of delaying it or opting for parenteral nutrition (PN).

2. Enteral Nutrition in Patients on Vasopressor Agents

In critically ill patients receiving vasopressors, ASPEN/SCCM suggests holding EN until the patient is fully resuscitated and stable. Reintroduction should be done cautiously as vasopressor support is withdrawn. Similarly, ESPEN advises delaying EN if shock is uncontrolled and only initiating it once the patient is stable, while carefully monitoring for signs of bowel ischemia.

3. Choosing the Appropriate Enteral Access Route

ASPEN/SCCM recommends that most critically ill patients start EN via a gastric route, with postpyloric access used in patients at high risk of aspiration or with gastric intolerance. For long-term EN (more than 4 weeks), gastrostomy or jejunostomy is preferred. ESPEN also advocates gastric feeding as the standard approach, recommending postpyloric feeding only for patients with gastric retention that does not improve with prokinetics or those at high risk of aspiration.

4. Determining Energy Requirements

ASPEN/SCCM suggests starting EN at low energy levels and gradually increasing intake over 4–7 days to match total energy expenditure. For patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or acute lung injury (ALI) requiring mechanical ventilation, either trophic or full EN is acceptable. ESPEN recommends a hypocaloric approach initially, not exceeding 70% of energy expenditure (EE) during the early phase of illness. After day 3, caloric intake can be increased to 80–100% of measured EE.

5. When Should Energy-Dense Formulas Be Used?

ASPEN/SCCM suggests using energy-dense formulas in patients with gastrointestinal intolerance to full-volume isocaloric EN, fluid restriction needs, or when transitioning to oral nutrition. However, ESPEN does not provide specific recommendations on this aspect.

6. How Much Protein Should Be Provided?

Protein intake is a critical component of EN in ICU patients. ASPEN/SCCM suggests administering 1.2–2.0 g/kg/day of protein, with higher amounts potentially needed for burn or multitrauma patients. ESPEN provides a more specific recommendation, stating that ICU patients should receive 1.3 g/kg/day of protein equivalents, gradually increasing intake over time.

7. Use of Hyperprotein Formulas

There is no specific recommendation from either ASPEN/SCCM or ESPEN on when hyperprotein formulas should be used. However, ASPEN/SCCM advises monitoring renal function and acid-base status in critically ill patients receiving high-protein nutrition.

8. Micronutrient Supplementation

ASPEN/SCCM suggests administering thiamin upon admission and providing a combination of antioxidant vitamins (C and E) and trace minerals (selenium, zinc, and copper) when needed. ESPEN does not provide specific recommendations regarding micronutrient supplementation in enterally fed ICU patients.

9. Screening and Management of Refeeding Syndrome

Both guidelines emphasize the need for close monitoring when initiating EN in malnourished or at-risk patients. ASPEN/SCCM recommends checking plasma phosphate levels at least once daily, administering low-dose EN, and supplementing with thiamin and phosphate if necessary. ESPEN provides a more detailed approach, recommending daily monitoring of potassium, magnesium, and phosphate for the first week of feeding. In cases of refeeding hypophosphatemia, electrolyte levels should be checked three times per day, and energy intake should be increased gradually.

10. Assessing Gastrointestinal Tolerance

ASPEN/SCCM strongly advises against using gastric residual volume (GRV) monitoring as a routine method for assessing gastrointestinal tolerance in ICU patients. If GRVs are still measured, EN should not be stopped unless GRVs exceed 500 ml and there are other signs of intolerance. ESPEN does not provide a specific recommendation on this aspect.

خلاصة

While both ASPEN/SCCM and ESPEN guidelines emphasize the importance of early enteral nutrition, they differ in specific recommendations regarding energy targets, protein intake, and screening for refeeding syndrome. ASPEN/SCCM tends to provide more flexible and expert-driven recommendations, whereas ESPEN offers structured and graded recommendations based on strong consensus.

Understanding these guidelines is essential for optimizing nutritional therapy in ICU patients, improving clinical outcomes, and preventing complications related to malnutrition and overfeeding.

👉 Compare recommendations on ESPEN Guidelines

📌 See related evidence in Critical Care journal – Nutrition in the ICU

👉 Learn more from the official ASPEN Clinical Guidelines

👉 Learn more in our Enteral Nutrition Course
, designed for clinical dietitians and healthcare professionals
.
.
.